(visninger)Populære tråde
Mellemrummet 8033326
Angst – Tro – Håb – Kærlighed 1614686
Et andet syn 1510734
Jesu ord 1126307
Den Evige Filosofi 931227
HansKrist Tigerens Rede :) Have
Hvem er online?
1 registreret somo 81 gæster og 21 søgemaskiner online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Side 6 af 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Tråd valgmuligheder ↓
« Forrige tråd
Næste tråd »
#19595 - 24/08/2015 14:23 Re: Forskere og ..........! [Re: somo]
Simon Offline
Registeret: 04/04/2008
Indlæg: 4683
“In the field of physiology, there is one verse which appears extremely significant to me. One thousand years before the discovery of the blood circulatory system, and roughly thirteen centuries before it was determined that the internal organs were nourished by the process of digestive , a verse in the Qur’an described the source of the constituents of milk, in conformity with scientific facts.

To understand this verse, it must first be known that chemical reactions occur between food and enzymes in the mouth, the stomach and the intestines releasing nutrients in molecular form which are then absorbed into the circulatory system through countless microscopic projections of the intestinal wall called villi. Blood in the circulatory system then transports the nutrients to all the organs of the body, among which are the milk-producing mammary glands.

This biological process must be basically understood, if we are to understand a verse in the Qur’an which has for many centuries given rise to commentaries that were totally incomprehensible.”

- Nej, forståelsen af enzymernes funktion – fx spytamylasen og resten af nedbrydningsprocessen – er ingen forudsætning for at forstå de mange komplet idiotiske idéer der figurerer i din lille bibel dér, og heller ikke vor tids psykologiske arbejdshypoteser adviserer en forståelse af din koran. Så den ka du godt pakke sammen, Somo…;)

Du vralter bare rundt i misforståelser, fordi du tolker alt omkring dig ind i tankebilleder der er vidt åbne for enhver misforståelse – som sædvanlig. Du må ligesom lægprædikanten Arne – der åbenbart stadig tror han er uigennemskuelig – lære at adskille religiøse dogmer fra faktisk videnskab. Længere er den ikke…;)


Redigeret af Simon (24/08/2015 14:25)
Top Svar Citer
#19599 - 28/08/2015 09:55 Re: Forskere og ..........! [Re: somo]
somo Offline
bor her
Registeret: 14/07/2012
Indlæg: 891
Once the egg has been fertilized in the fallopian tube, it descends to lodge itself inside the uterus. This process is called the ‘implantation of the egg’. Implantation is a result of the development of villosities, which, like roots in the soil, draw nourishment from the wall of the uterus and make the egg literally cling to the womb. The process of implantation is appropriately described in several verses by the word ‘alaq, which is also the title of the chapter in which one of the verses appears:
“God fashioned humans from a clinging entity.” Qur’an, 96:2

The evolution of the embryo inside the maternal uterus is only briefly described, but the description is accurate, because the simple words referring to it correspond exactly to fundamental stages in its growth. This is what we read in a verse from the chapter al-Mu’minoon:
“I fashioned the clinging entity into a chewed lump of flesh and I fashioned the chewed flesh into bones and I clothed the bones with intact flesh.” Qur’an, 23:14
The term ‘chewed flesh’ (mudghah) corresponds exactly to the appearance of the embryo at a certain stage in its development.
It is known that the bones develop inside this mass and that they are then covered with muscle. This is the meaning of the term ‘intact flesh’ (lahm).

The embryo passes through a stage where some parts are in proportion and others out of proportion with what is later to become the individual. This is the obvious meaning of a verse in the chapter al-Hajj, which reads as follows:
“I fashioned (humans) a clinging entity, then into a lump of flesh in proportion and out of proportion.” Qur’an, 22:5.
Next, we have a reference to the appearance of the senses and internal organs in the chapter as-Sajdah:
“… and (God) gave you ears, eyes and hearts.” Qur’an, 32:9
Nothing here contradicts today’s data and, furthermore, none of the mistaken ideas of the time have crept into the Qur’an. Throughout the Middle Ages there were a variety of beliefs about human development based on myths and speculations which continued for several centuries after the period.

The most fundamental stage in the history of embryology came in 1651 with Harvey’s statement that “all life initially comes from an egg”. At that time, when science had benefited greatly from the invention of the microscope, people were still arguing about the respective roles of the egg and spermatozoon. Buffon, the great naturalist, was one of those in favor of the egg theory.Bonnet, on the other hand, supported the theory of ‘the ovaries of Eve’, which stated that Eve, the mother of the human race, was-supposed to have had inside her the seeds of all human beings packed together one inside the other.
Top Svar Citer
#19607 - 31/08/2015 08:35 Re: Forskere og ..........! [Re: somo]
somo Offline
bor her
Registeret: 14/07/2012
Indlæg: 891
comparison between modern knowledge and passages in the Qur’an that are also referred to in the Bible.
We have already come across some of the contradictions between scripture and science regarding the creation of the universe. When dealing with that topic, I stressed the perfect agreement between modern knowledge and verses in the Qur’an, and pointed out that the Biblical narration contained statements that were scientifically unacceptable.

This is hardly surprising if we are aware that the narration of the creation contained in the Bible was the work of priests living in the sixth century BC, hence the term ‘sacerdotal’ ( priestly ) narration is officially used to refer to it. The narration seems to have been conceived as the theme of a sermon designed to exhort people to observe the Sabbath. The narration was constructed with a definite end in view, and as Father de Vaux (a former head of the Biblical School of Jerusalem) has noted, this end was essentially legalist in character.

The Bible also contains a much shorter and older narration of Creation, the so-called ‘Yahvist’ version, which approaches the subject from a completely different angle. They are both taken from Genesis, the first book of the Pentateuch or Torah. Moses is supposed to have been its author, but the text we have today has undergone many changes.

The sacerdotal narration of Genesis is famous for its whimsical genealogies, that go back to Adam, and which nobody takes very seriously. Nevertheless, such Gospel authors as Matthew and Luke have reproduced them, more or less word-for-word, in their genealogies of Jesus. Matthew goes back as far as Abraham, and Luke to Adam. These writings are scientifically unacceptable, because they set a date for the age of the world and the time humans appeared on Earth, which most definitely contradicts what modern science has firmly established. The Qur’an, on the other hand, is completely free of dates of this kind.

Earlier on, we noted how perfectly the Qur’an agrees with modern ideas on the formation of the Universe. On the other hand, the Biblical narration of primordial waters is hardly, nor is the creation of light on the first day before the creation of the stars which produce this light; the existence of an evening and a morning before the creation of the earth; the creation of the earth on the third day before that of the sun on the fourth; the appearance of beasts of the earth on the sixth day after the appearance of the birds of the air on the fifth day, although the former came first. All these statements are the result of beliefs prevalent at the time this text was written and do not have any other meaning.
Top Svar Citer
#19628 - 05/09/2015 10:36 Re: Forskere og ..........! [Re: somo]
somo Offline
bor her
Registeret: 14/07/2012
Indlæg: 891
Top Svar Citer
#19632 - 07/09/2015 10:43 Re: Forskere og ..........! [Re: somo]
somo Offline
bor her
Registeret: 14/07/2012
Indlæg: 891
comparison between the Bible and the Qur’an; descriptions of the deluge. In actual fact, the Biblical narration is a fusion of two descriptions in which events are related differently. The Bible speaks of a universal flood and places it roughly 300 years before Abraham.
According to what we know of Abraham, this would imply a universal cataclysm around the twenty-first or twenty-second century BC This story would be untenable, in view of presently available historical data.

How can we accept the idea that, in the twenty-first or twenty-second century BC, all civilization was wiped off the face of the earth by a universal cataclysm, when we know that this period corresponds, for example, to the one preceding the Middle Kingdom in Egypt, at roughly the date of the first Intermediary period before the eleventh dynasty? It is historically unacceptable to maintain that, at this time, humanity was totally wiped out. None of the preceding statements is acceptable according to modern knowledge. From this point of view, we can measure the enormous gap separating the Bible from the Qur’an.

In contrast to the Bible, the narration contained in the Qur’an deals with a cataclysm that is limited to Noah’s people. They were punished for their sins, as were other ungodly peoples. The Qur’an does not fix the cataclysm in time. There are absolutely no historical or archaeological objections to the narration in the Qur’an.

Quran correct Bible Noahs Flood

Noah's Ark in the bible and the quran
Top Svar Citer
Side 6 af 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Seneste indlæg
Slet min profil
af Hanskrist
23/09/2021 16:26
Åndelig Føde
af Gerth
23/09/2021 01:59
Gennemsigtighed og troværdighed af faktiske fakta
af somo
20/09/2021 07:03
Klima- og Corona-krise
af Anonym
13/09/2021 17:36
af Gerth
04/09/2021 01:03
Nyheder fra DR
Notting Hill-instruktøren er død
23/09/2021 19:34
Kommunalt ansatte snagede i flere hundre..
23/09/2021 18:51
34 år gammel drabssag anket: Frifundet ..
23/09/2021 18:36
Se billederne: Verdens bedste kitesurfer..
23/09/2021 18:28
Danmark forstærker forsvarssamarbejdet ..
23/09/2021 18:09
Nyheder fra
Er gudforældre en protestantisk eller k..
31/08/2021 12:17
Må præsten selv vælge bibeloversætte..
27/08/2021 07:54
Hvordan skal en lærer håndtere, når f..
19/07/2021 06:00
Hvad mener buddhismen om genmanipulation..
06/07/2021 08:25
Hvordan opdrager man bedst sine børn, n..
28/06/2021 06:00